Pablo Picasso Period of creation: 1908-1918 – 1913 Violon accrochВ au mur
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
A dominant element is the dark, almost black, central form which likely represents the neck of the instrument. It’s sharply angled, cutting across the canvas and disrupting any sense of spatial continuity. The body of the instrument is rendered in a series of overlapping planes – ochre, orange-red, and cream – creating a flattened effect that denies depth. The f-holes, characteristic features of such instruments, are depicted as stylized curves, almost abstract symbols rather than realistic openings.
The wall itself isn’t presented as a continuous surface but is broken down into rectangular blocks of varying hues: pale yellows, creams, and touches of grey. These planes intersect with the instruments forms, further complicating the spatial relationships. A scroll at the top left corner echoes the curves found elsewhere in the composition, while a horizontal band along the right side introduces another layer of geometric structure.
The color palette is restrained, primarily utilizing earth tones punctuated by the blue-grey of the central vertical form. This limited range contributes to a sense of austerity and intellectual detachment. The application of paint appears deliberate, with visible brushstrokes adding texture and emphasizing the materiality of the work.
Subtly, one might interpret this deconstruction as an exploration of perception itself. By dismantling the familiar object into its constituent parts, the artist challenges the viewers ability to recognize and understand what is being depicted. The painting isn’t about faithfully reproducing a violin; it’s about examining how we construct meaning through visual representation and questioning the nature of reality itself. The fragmentation could also be read as an expression of disruption or loss – a sense that something once whole has been broken apart, leaving behind only fragments of memory or experience.