Pablo Picasso Period of creation: 1908-1918 – 1913 TИte dhomme
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The composition presents a fragmented figure rendered through a complex interplay of geometric forms and planes. The artist has eschewed traditional representational techniques, opting instead for a deconstruction of human form into abstract elements. A central, roughly triangular shape dominates the visual field, constructed from overlapping planes in shades of blue and white. This element appears to be tilted diagonally across the canvas, disrupting any sense of stable perspective.
To its left, a series of vertical bands alternate between ochre and black, creating a rhythmic pattern that contrasts with the angularity of the central form. These bands seem to act as both structural supports and visual barriers, further fragmenting the figure’s presence. A section on the lower left features a dense field of small dots or brushstrokes in dark tones, adding textural complexity and suggesting depth within this flattened space.
The artist employs a limited palette – primarily blues, whites, ochres, blacks, and grays – which contributes to a sense of austerity and intellectual detachment. Lines are used extensively, not as outlines but as directional cues that emphasize the shifting planes and fractured nature of the depicted subject. The overall effect is one of disorientation and ambiguity; the figure’s identity remains elusive, reduced to a collection of disparate shapes and angles.
Subtly embedded within this abstraction, hints of recognizable features can be discerned – a suggestion of an eye, a profile, or perhaps a shoulder – though these are quickly subsumed by the overall fragmentation. This deliberate obscuring suggests a questioning of traditional notions of portraiture and representation. The work seems to explore not just what a person looks like, but how perception itself is fractured and mediated through multiple viewpoints. Theres an underlying tension between the desire for recognition and the artist’s conscious dismantling of that possibility. It evokes a sense of psychological complexity, hinting at themes of identity, displacement, or perhaps even trauma, all conveyed through this radical visual language.