Pablo Picasso Period of creation: 1931-1942 – 1938 Maya Е la poupВe1
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see the girl positioned centrally, her gaze directed outward but seemingly devoid of warmth or engagement. Her features are stylized; the eyes are disproportionately large and set wide apart, lending a sense of vacancy or perhaps vulnerability. The skin tone is an unnatural green, immediately signaling a departure from realism and suggesting a symbolic representation rather than a straightforward depiction. The hair, also green, is pulled back into pigtails adorned with blue bows, a detail that attempts to evoke childhood innocence but ultimately feels jarring in the context of the painting’s overall mood.
The doll held by the girl mirrors her own unsettling appearance. It too possesses an unnatural skin tone and large eyes, creating a visual echo that reinforces the sense of artificiality and perhaps isolation. The dolls posture is slumped, its head tilted downwards, suggesting a mirroring of emotional distress or resignation.
The artist has employed a flattened perspective, minimizing depth and contributing to the painting’s dreamlike quality. The background is a simple, indistinct plane of color that does little to ground the figures in a specific location, further emphasizing their isolation. The clothing worn by both girl and doll – a blue dress with white lace trim for the girl, and a striped outfit for the doll – adds another layer of complexity. These details suggest an attempt at conventional childhood attire, but the colors are subdued and the overall effect is more somber than cheerful.
Subtexts within this work seem to revolve around themes of innocence lost, artificiality, and perhaps even psychological distress. The unnatural coloring and distorted features could be interpreted as a visual representation of inner turmoil or a commentary on societal expectations placed upon children. The mirroring between girl and doll suggests a blurring of boundaries – are they separate entities, or are they reflections of the same underlying emotional state? The painting evokes a sense of unease and invites contemplation about the fragility of childhood and the potential for darkness to exist beneath a veneer of innocence.