Pablo Picasso Period of creation: 1943-1961 (Femme couchВe) – 1944 Nu au divan
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The color palette is predominantly monochromatic, dominated by shades of gray and black. This restricted range contributes to the paintings somber mood and reinforces the feeling of detachment. The limited use of lighter tones highlights certain areas – notably the face and torso – while leaving others submerged in shadow. These contrasts draw attention to the figure’s contours and emphasize the angularity of her form.
The setting appears to be a low-slung piece of furniture, possibly a divan or daybed, rendered with similar geometric simplification as the figure itself. The flatness of this element reinforces the overall lack of spatial depth within the painting. There is no discernible background beyond the dark plane against which the figure rests; it functions more as an atmospheric void than a defined space.
The woman’s face is particularly striking in its ambiguity. One eye is prominently displayed, staring directly outward, while the other remains largely obscured by shadow and angular planes. This asymmetry creates a sense of unease and invites speculation about her emotional state. The pose itself – reclining with one arm extended – suggests vulnerability and repose, yet the fragmented representation prevents any easy interpretation of these qualities.
Subtly, the painting evokes themes of confinement and introspection. The dark background and flattened perspective suggest a psychological space rather than a physical location. The woman’s posture could be interpreted as either surrender or resistance, her gaze simultaneously inviting and repelling. The fractured depiction of the body might symbolize a sense of displacement or fragmentation, perhaps reflecting an internal struggle or external trauma. Ultimately, the work resists straightforward narrative interpretation, instead prompting viewers to contemplate the complexities of human experience through a lens of abstraction and emotional ambiguity.