Pablo Picasso Period of creation: 1943-1961 – 1945 Composition et volumes
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The leftmost shape is rounded, almost spherical, and appears to emerge from a central vertical axis. This axis then bifurcates into a larger, more elongated form that dominates the right side of the canvas. The upper portion of this larger form curves inward, creating a sense of enclosure or containment. A third, smaller volume sits atop the central axis, seemingly balanced precariously above the spherical shape.
The application of paint is characterized by broad, gestural strokes, particularly evident in the background and around the edges of the forms. This technique contributes to a feeling of dynamism and immediacy, suggesting an ongoing process of creation rather than a finished product. The lack of sharp outlines blurs the boundaries between shapes, further emphasizing their volumetric qualities. Light appears to emanate from behind the forms, casting subtle shadows that define their contours without creating stark contrasts.
The subdued color palette reinforces the paintings introspective nature. The monochromatic scheme directs attention towards the formal elements – shape, volume, and spatial relationships – rather than any narrative or symbolic content. This absence of overt meaning invites contemplation on the fundamental principles of visual organization.
Subtly, a sense of tension is present within the composition. The precarious balance of the upper form, coupled with the ambiguous relationship between the shapes, generates an underlying unease. It could be interpreted as reflecting themes of fragility, instability, or the inherent complexities of existence. Alternatively, it might simply represent a purely formal exploration of volume and spatial relationships, devoid of any deeper symbolic intent. The painting’s strength lies in its ability to evoke multiple interpretations without offering definitive answers.