Pablo Picasso Period of creation: 1943-1961 – 1957 Le piano (Velаzquez)
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
A dark, rectangular structure, presumably a piano, occupies a central position. Its surface is not depicted realistically; instead, it’s treated as a series of planes and angles, with musical notation seemingly affixed to its front. Above the instrument, a vase containing foliage and what appears to be a stylized face introduces an element of still life, further complicating the narrative.
Below the figure, a canine form is suggested through broad brushstrokes and simplified shapes. Its posture conveys a sense of languid observation, as if it were passively witnessing the scene unfolding above. The background is divided into blocks of color – a deep brown-black on one side and a warm terracotta on the other – which serve to isolate the central elements and enhance their visual impact.
The artist’s use of flattened perspective and fractured forms suggests an interest in deconstructing traditional notions of representation. Theres a deliberate avoidance of depth, creating a sense of spatial ambiguity. The color palette is restrained but impactful; the red of the figure contrasts sharply with the cooler tones of the background and the dark hues of the piano.
Subtextually, one might interpret this as an exploration of artistic creation itself – the fragmented forms mirroring the process of breaking down and reassembling ideas. The presence of music, both visually represented through the instrument and implied by the figure’s posture, suggests a focus on the power of art to evoke emotion and transcend literal representation. The dogs inclusion could be read as a symbol of loyalty or passive observation, perhaps commenting on the role of the audience in experiencing art. Ultimately, the work resists easy interpretation, inviting viewers to engage with its ambiguities and construct their own meanings from its fragmented elements.