Pablo Picasso Period of creation: 1962-1973 – 1963 TИte dhomme
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
On the left, we see a figure whose back dominates the view. The body is rendered in a reddish-brown hue, with minimal detail. A large swath of blue extends from behind this figure, appearing to both envelop and partially obscure it. The head is turned away, suggesting introspection or perhaps avoidance. In the lower portion of this figure’s back, theres an indication of a small, rectangular object – possibly a pocket or some other personal item – adding a touch of domesticity to the otherwise abstracted form.
To the right stands another figure, depicted in a pale pink tone. This individual is positioned more directly towards the viewer, though still presented with a degree of angular distortion. The body is muscular and elongated, with an emphasis on the ribcage and buttocks. A series of lines are drawn across the abdomen, creating a grid-like pattern that disrupts the surface and introduces a sense of fragmentation or dissection. The head is tilted upward, suggesting either vulnerability or defiance.
The blue lines function as both structural elements and visual disruptions. They seem to connect the two figures, yet simultaneously sever them from one another. Their abruptness and lack of naturalistic flow contribute to the overall feeling of unease and disorientation.
Subtextually, the work seems to explore themes of isolation, fragmentation, and the complexities of human connection. The obscured faces and distorted bodies suggest a sense of alienation or psychological distress. The juxtaposition of the two figures – one withdrawn and introspective, the other seemingly exposed and vulnerable – hints at a power dynamic or an unresolved tension. The grid-like pattern on the second figure’s abdomen could be interpreted as a metaphor for societal control or the dehumanizing effects of modern life. Ultimately, the painting resists easy interpretation, inviting viewers to project their own meanings onto its ambiguous forms.