Pablo Picasso Period of creation: 1962-1973 – 1969 Mousquetaire
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The face is dominated by an oversized eye, centrally positioned and possessing a stark, almost unsettling intensity. The surrounding planes of the face are delineated with sharp angles and contrasting colors – pale yellows and whites juxtaposed against deep blues and purples – creating a sense of fractured identity. A single, prominent nose juts out from the disrupted facial structure, while the mouth is reduced to a dark, ambiguous slit.
The figure’s attire contributes to an air of theatricality or historical reference. The jackets rich orange hue contrasts with the cooler tones of the face and background, drawing attention to its elaborate detailing. A glimpse of what appears to be a blue curtain or backdrop is visible behind the subject, further emphasizing the sense of performance or staged representation.
The artist’s brushwork is loose and expressive, contributing to the overall feeling of dynamism and instability. The paint application is thick in places, creating textural variation that adds depth and visual interest. A handwritten inscription appears at the upper right corner, seemingly dates and signatures, which further reinforces the sense of a personal record or artistic documentation.
Subtextually, the work seems to explore themes of identity, fragmentation, and representation. The distorted features suggest a questioning of conventional notions of selfhood, while the theatrical setting implies a constructed persona rather than an authentic portrayal. The deliberate disruption of perspective and form could be interpreted as a commentary on the limitations of visual perception or the subjective nature of reality. The military-inspired attire hints at themes of power, authority, and perhaps even societal roles, but these are presented in a manner that undermines any straightforward interpretation. Ultimately, the painting resists easy categorization, inviting viewers to engage with its ambiguities and complexities.