Portrait of hepatitis. 1899 Valentin Serov (1865-1911)
Valentin Serov – Portrait of hepatitis. 1899
Edit attribution
Download full size: 703×1000 px (0,1 Mb)
Painter: Valentin Serov
The apogee of Valentin Serov’s marvelous gift for painting portraits was his 1899 painting Portrait of Botkina. The work received public acclaim from European bohemia and connoisseurs of the art of the secular portrait. The 1900 World’s Fair in the French capital recognized the author of the canvas’s right to the Grand Prix. Why is the portrait of Sophia Botkina so remarkable? The artist departed from the tradition of painting secular faces in their self-confident arrogance and solemn pomp.
Description of the painting "Portrait of Sophia Botkina" by Valentin Serov
The apogee of Valentin Serov’s marvelous gift for painting portraits was his 1899 painting Portrait of Botkina. The work received public acclaim from European bohemia and connoisseurs of the art of the secular portrait. The 1900 World’s Fair in the French capital recognized the author of the canvas’s right to the Grand Prix.
Why is the portrait of Sophia Botkina so remarkable? The artist departed from the tradition of painting secular faces in their self-confident arrogance and solemn pomp. The figure of the young wife of the collector Botkin looks fragile, defenseless and modest.
It seems as if the baroque sofa on which the model has taken a seat and all her beautiful attire with its full set of gold ornaments are alien to this woman’s personality. The sofa looks inappropriately large and pretentiously tasteless, with its pompousness and expensiveness.
The model sits on one edge, almost on the edge of the furniture. It is a genius of the portraitist to take the personality of the person depicted out of the surrounding background in this way. The color helps to fully embody this idea. The background and floor are in muted browns, grays and bluish tones. The sofa is dark blue. All attention is automatically drawn to the delicate and beautiful Sofia. Her slender, collected body is dressed in a yellowish dress covered with pink buds.
The little dog beside the lady is merely a tribute to fashion, or perhaps the dictates of the married woman’s husband. From the heroine’s eyes you can think of her mental loneliness. Her self-absorbed, thoughtful gaze is modestly downcast and directed past the painting.
The ornamentality and brilliance of the painting’s objects obediently pales before the author’s illumination of the heroine’s mental world. The background and all the objects on the canvas involuntarily recede into the background, and the tender sadness in the young woman’s eyes makes the viewer feel sympathy for Sophia Botkina, a lady from centuries irrevocably lost to oblivion.
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
The color palette is restrained, built around muted tones of gold, peach, and blue. The woman’s gown, rendered in shimmering fabrics, reflects these hues, creating a visual harmony that extends to the chair she occupies. The deep blue upholstery provides a stark contrast against her lighter attire, emphasizing her presence within the frame.
The artist employed loose brushstrokes, particularly evident in the background which dissolves into an indistinct grey-green space. This technique contributes to a sense of depth and envelops the figure in a soft, diffused light. Details are suggested rather than precisely defined; the face is rendered with subtle shading that captures a melancholic expression. The elaborate hairstyle, typical for the period, adds to the overall impression of elegance and refinement.
Subtleties within the painting suggest layers of meaning beyond a simple likeness. The woman’s posture, while upright, possesses a certain fragility. Her hands are clasped in her lap, a gesture that can be interpreted as either modesty or resignation. The muted color scheme and hazy atmosphere evoke a feeling of unease or sadness, hinting at an underlying emotional complexity.
The chair itself, with its elaborate gilded carvings, seems almost too grand for the subject, creating a visual tension between outward appearance and inner state. It could symbolize societal expectations or the burden of responsibility. The overall effect is one of quiet dignity tinged with melancholy, prompting contemplation on themes of illness, mortality, and the complexities of human experience.