Château de Versailles – Anne-Louis Girodet de Roucy-Trioson -- Revolt in Cairo on October 21, 1798
1810, 365х500
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The foreground is particularly brutal. Here we see several bodies strewn across the floor, some lifeless, others writhing in pain. A man lies prone, his face turned away from the viewer, suggesting a sudden and violent demise. Adjacent to him, figures are locked in close-quarters combat; one soldier wields a curved sword with evident force, while another struggles against an attacker’s grasp. The artist has rendered these interactions with considerable detail, emphasizing the physicality of the struggle – the straining muscles, the contorted expressions, the glint of metal on skin.
Further back within the space, the conflict continues, though at a slightly reduced scale. A group of armed men, identifiable by their distinctive turbans and clothing, appear to be confronting a larger contingent of soldiers in European military attire. Smoke hangs heavy in the air, obscuring details and adding to the atmosphere of confusion and peril. The architecture itself – characterized by arched windows and ornate detailing – provides a stark contrast to the barbarity unfolding within it.
The composition is structured around several key focal points. A central figure, seemingly a leader or high-ranking official, is depicted being dragged forward amidst the melee. His exposed torso and anguished expression draw immediate attention, suggesting his vulnerability and the precariousness of his position. The diagonal lines created by the bodies and weapons contribute to the overall sense of instability and disorder.
Subtleties within the work hint at a complex narrative beyond mere depiction of battle. The presence of women – one figure in particular, draped in white and seemingly pleading for mercy – introduces an element of pathos and raises questions about the impact of conflict on civilian populations. The contrast between the opulent setting and the brutal violence suggests a commentary on the fragility of power and the disruption of established order. It is possible to interpret this as a visual exploration of colonial ambition, resistance, and the human cost of political upheaval. The artist’s choice to depict such a specific historical event – a revolt – implies an engagement with contemporary political discourse and potentially offers a nuanced perspective on the complexities of revolution and its aftermath.