Portrait of Pere Tanguy Vincent van Gogh (1853-1890)
Vincent van Gogh – Portrait of Pere Tanguy
Edit attribution
Download full size: 1606×2045 px (0,8 Mb)
Painter: Vincent van Gogh
Location: Rodin Museum (Musée Rodin), Paris.
Van Gogh Portrait of Papa Tanguy Van Gogh painted this painting in 1887-1888. Julien François Tanguy owned a store that sold items for painters. His customers were not only famous Impressionists, but also post-Impressionists. Tanguy participated in the Paris Commune. Then he was exiled. This man’s soul is incredibly broad. His shop sold all the brushes and paints needed for artists. Tanguy was nicknamed Papa for his kindness.
Description of Vincent van Gogh’s Portrait of Papa Tanguy
Van Gogh Portrait of Papa Tanguy Van Gogh painted this painting in 1887-1888. Julien François Tanguy owned a store that sold items for painters. His customers were not only famous Impressionists, but also post-Impressionists. Tanguy participated in the Paris Commune. Then he was exiled. This man’s soul is incredibly broad.
His shop sold all the brushes and paints needed for artists. Tanguy was nicknamed Papa for his kindness. Very often artists did not have the money to buy everything they needed to paint. He would agree to accept painted creations and give paints and canvas in return. Tanguy even had his own art gallery, though very small.
Sometimes some of the paintings were sold. It was Tanguy who first exhibited Van Gogh’s work. But during his lifetime, none of Van Gogh’s works that were in his possession were sold. The painter created three portraits of Tanguy. It was the last portrait that was the most successful. In it he is maximally idealized. The symbolic meaning is hidden in the image of his father Tanguy. We see him in a very characteristic Buddha pose. His gaze is full of determination and his face is mathematically symmetrical. The wall, which has a complex structure, is in contrast to the figure.
What we have before us are genuine Japanese engravings. They deserved the attention of many of Van Gogh’s contemporaries. It seems that the entire composition is flattened on purpose. And Tanguy seems to be pushed forward. The veins protrude strongly on Tanguy’s hands. They contrast very strongly with the jacket in blue. The colors of the canvas are so vivid that Tanguy’s figure seems as real as possible.
This painting anticipated those magnificent works of the painter, which were created by him much later already in Arles. The exuberance of colors and masterful transitions of color can not help but amaze. It seems both real and fabulous at the same time.
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
The background is far from a simple backdrop; it’s a vibrant tapestry of disparate elements seemingly borrowed from various sources. A stylized landscape dominates the upper portion, featuring what appears to be a snow-capped mountain rising above rolling hills and a winding river. This scene is rendered in broad strokes of yellow, green, blue, and pink, creating an almost dreamlike quality. To the left and right of the figure are further fragmented images – hints of figures, swirling patterns, and abstract shapes that resist easy interpretation. These elements appear to be integrated into the background through a technique involving bold outlines and contrasting colors, suggesting a deliberate attempt to create visual tension and depth.
The artist’s use of color is particularly striking. The somber tones of the figures clothing are juxtaposed against the bright, almost hallucinatory hues of the landscape. This contrast creates a sense of isolation for the subject, as if he exists within a world that is both familiar and alien. The thick application of paint – the impasto technique – adds texture and physicality to the work, further emphasizing the artist’s expressive intent.
Subtly, the painting suggests themes of memory, loss, and the passage of time. The figures aged appearance and the fragmented nature of the background could be interpreted as a reflection on the ephemeral quality of experience. The inclusion of seemingly unrelated imagery hints at the way memories can surface unexpectedly, blurring the boundaries between past and present. There is an underlying sense of introspection; the portrait isn’t merely a depiction of a person but rather an exploration of human existence within a world marked by change and uncertainty.