Andrei Rublev (1360s - 1430s) -- Deesis order
1410-1420-е, 2.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The color palette is restrained, dominated by earthy tones – ochres, browns, and muted reds – characteristic of medieval Russian painting techniques. The use of gold leaf highlights certain areas, particularly around the head and shoulders, suggesting a spiritual aura and emphasizing the subject’s elevated status. However, significant portions of the gold have been lost or damaged over time, revealing the underlying wood panel.
The surface texture is visibly aged and distressed. Extensive flaking and loss of paint are evident, especially along the edges of the figures head and shoulders. These areas of deterioration contribute to a sense of fragility and historical weight. The damage isn’t merely cosmetic; it actively shapes the viewer’s perception, prompting reflection on the passage of time and the impermanence of material objects.
The background is a uniform gold ground, typical for icons, which serves to isolate the figure and direct attention towards his face. Theres an absence of any landscape or narrative elements, reinforcing the focus on spiritual contemplation rather than worldly events. The simplicity of the composition underscores the solemnity of the subject matter.
Subtly, the damage itself introduces a layer of complexity. It suggests not only physical decay but also perhaps a history of veneration and handling – evidence of the icon’s active role in religious practice over centuries. The visible wear and tear can be interpreted as a visual testament to faith and devotion, marking the icons journey through time and its connection to generations of believers.