National Gallery of Art – Rembrandt Workshop - Joseph Accused by Potiphar’s Wife
1655. Oil on canvas transferred to canvas, 105.7 x 97.8 cm. Credit: Courtesy National Gallery of Art, Washington.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
To his right stands an older man, presumably in a position of authority. His demeanor is markedly different from that of the younger figure. While not overtly aggressive, theres a firmness in his stance and a guardedness in his expression. He gestures towards the young man with one hand while the other rests on his shoulder, suggesting a complex mix of concern, skepticism, and perhaps even reluctant acceptance of the unfolding narrative. The older man’s attire is more elaborate, incorporating headwear that denotes rank or position.
A woman occupies the background, partially obscured by the bedclothes. Her face remains largely in shadow, making it difficult to discern her precise expression. However, the way she gestures towards the discarded garment lying on the bed implies a direct involvement in the events leading up to this moment. The red fabric of the garment is prominently displayed, drawing attention to its significance as evidence.
The artist employed a dramatic use of chiaroscuro – a stark contrast between light and dark – to heighten the emotional intensity of the scene. Areas of illumination are concentrated on the faces and hands of the figures, while the surrounding space recedes into deep shadow. This technique not only directs the viewers attention but also contributes to an atmosphere of suspense and moral ambiguity. The limited palette, dominated by earthy tones punctuated by the vibrant red of the garment, reinforces the somber mood.
Subtly, the painting explores themes of power dynamics, false accusation, and the complexities of human judgment. The younger man’s vulnerability is palpable, while the older man embodies a position of authority that complicates the narrative. The womans obscured presence introduces an element of mystery and raises questions about her motives. Ultimately, the work invites contemplation on the fragility of reputation and the potential for misinterpretation in matters of personal integrity.