National Gallery of Art – Gabriel Metsu - The Intruder
C. 1660. Oil on panel, 66.6 x 59.4 cm. Gabriel Metsu (Dutch, 1629 1667). Credit: Courtesy National Gallery of Art, Washington.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
To her left stands another woman, clad in green, observing the unfolding drama with a detached air. She appears to be engaged in some task involving a small box on a nearby table; her gaze is directed downwards, seemingly avoiding direct involvement in the interaction between the two central figures. A small dog at her feet adds a touch of domesticity and further emphasizes the private nature of the setting.
The man’s gesture – reaching out to touch the young womans cheek – is ambiguous. It could be interpreted as an attempt at reassurance, or alternatively, as a possessive claim. His elaborate attire, including a dark coat with fur trim, signals his status and authority within this social context. He is seated on a chair draped in red fabric, which draws attention to him and further emphasizes his position of power.
The lighting plays a crucial role in shaping the narrative. A strong light source illuminates the figures from the left, highlighting their faces and emphasizing their expressions. The shadows cast across the room create a sense of depth and mystery, obscuring details and contributing to the overall atmosphere of tension.
Several objects scattered on the floor – a pitcher and small bowls – add to the impression of an interrupted moment. They suggest that preparations for breakfast or another domestic activity were underway when the intrusion occurred. The discarded slippers near the young woman’s feet further underscore her state of surprise and vulnerability.
Subtleties in the composition invite speculation about the nature of the relationship between these individuals. Is this a clandestine meeting, an unwelcome visit from a suitor, or perhaps a scene depicting social transgression? The paintings strength lies in its ability to evoke questions rather than provide definitive answers, leaving room for multiple interpretations regarding the dynamics at play within this intimate domestic space.