Part 5 Louvre – Kalam, Alexander (1810-1864) -- Broken tree
35х49
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 2 Ответы
Пейзаж хорош!
Замечательная живопись. Очень талантливый художник.
You cannot comment Why?
The artist’s handling of light contributes significantly to the paintings mood. The illumination is diffuse, lacking strong directional shadows, which softens the impact of the destruction while simultaneously emphasizing the textures of bark and foliage. A sense of melancholy pervades the scene; the broken tree becomes a potent symbol of loss or disruption.
Beyond the literal depiction of a fallen tree, subtexts emerge concerning resilience and decay. The remaining trees in the background suggest an ongoing cycle of life, hinting that even amidst devastation, nature persists. The exposed roots could be interpreted as representing vulnerability, while the upward reach of the broken branches might symbolize a lingering hope or aspiration despite the trauma endured.
The painting’s scale and perspective invite contemplation on themes of time, change, and the fragility of existence. It is not merely an observation of natural phenomena but rather a meditation on the forces that shape our world and the enduring power of nature to both destroy and regenerate. The muted color palette reinforces this somber yet contemplative atmosphere, preventing any sense of celebratory triumph over adversity.