Part 5 Louvre – Jusepe de Ribera (1591-1652) -- The Clubfooted Boy
1642, 164х94
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The boy’s attire consists of simple, earth-toned garments: a loose shirt, trousers, and a short cloak draped across his shoulders. These clothes denote a humble social standing, reinforcing the sense of realism characteristic of the period. A small pouch hangs from his belt, its contents obscured but hinting at meager possessions or perhaps tools for survival.
His expression is striking – a broad, almost mischievous grin dominates his face. This smile contrasts sharply with the potential hardship implied by his physical condition and simple clothing. It could be interpreted as a display of resilience, an attempt to mask vulnerability, or simply a natural exuberance that transcends circumstance. The direct gaze he establishes with the viewer creates a sense of immediacy and challenges any easy categorization based on appearance alone.
The landscape visible in the background is sparsely rendered, featuring distant trees and rolling hills under a pale sky. This backdrop serves primarily as a spatial context rather than an integral element of the narrative. It contributes to the overall feeling of isolation and emphasizes the boy’s solitary presence within the frame.
A small piece of paper held loosely in his hand bears writing that is illegible, but its inclusion suggests a connection to literacy or perhaps a document related to his identity or situation – a subtle detail adding layers of intrigue. The lighting is dramatic, with strong contrasts between light and shadow highlighting the boy’s features and emphasizing the texture of his clothing. This chiaroscuro effect intensifies the emotional impact of the scene and draws attention to the subjects physicality.
The painting seems to explore themes of disability, social status, and resilience through a seemingly straightforward depiction of a young boy. The artist avoids sentimentality, instead presenting a complex portrait that invites contemplation about human dignity in the face of adversity.