Part 5 Louvre – Charles Le Brun -- Entry of Alexander in Babylon (Triumph of Alexander); detail
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a woman draped in a flowing, pale blue garment, her skin rendered with a delicate luminosity. She cradles an infant, while another child clings to her leg. Her posture suggests both protectiveness and a degree of apprehension; she is positioned slightly apart from the central action, observing it rather than fully engaging. The orange drapery of the figure beside her creates a striking contrast against the cool blues and creams that define the woman’s attire and the surrounding environment. This color juxtaposition draws attention to their presence within the composition.
Behind this group, figures in classical garb are visible, some bearing musical instruments – a flute player is particularly prominent – and others holding ceremonial staffs or banners. The light falls dramatically upon them, highlighting their idealized physiques and contributing to a sense of theatrical grandeur. A large elephant, adorned with garlands, looms in the background, further emphasizing the scale and opulence of the event.
The artist has employed a sophisticated use of chiaroscuro, creating areas of deep shadow that heighten the drama and direct the viewer’s eye toward key focal points. The expressions on the faces are varied; some convey joy and celebration, while others suggest awe or perhaps even a subtle undercurrent of anxiety. This range of emotions adds depth to the narrative, hinting at the complexities inherent in moments of triumph and public display.
Subtly embedded within this scene is an exploration of familial bonds amidst spectacle. The woman’s concern for her children suggests a grounding element – a private sphere existing alongside the public celebration. It implies that even within grand historical narratives, personal relationships and vulnerabilities remain significant. The detail also raises questions about power dynamics; are these figures participants or observers? Are they subjects or witnesses to this display of authority? These ambiguities contribute to the painting’s richness and invite contemplation beyond a superficial reading of triumph and victory.