Metropolitan Museum: part 1 – Bartholomew Dandridge - Uvedale Tomkyns Price (1685–1764) and Members of His Family
Bartholomew Dandridge: English, London 1691–in or after 1754 London possibly early 1730s; Oil on canvas; 40 1/4 x 62 1/2 in. (102.2 x 158.8 cm)
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Several individuals are arranged across the foreground. Two young boys, dressed in elaborate attire indicative of their social standing, occupy a central position; one gestures outward, seemingly directing attention to something beyond the frame. A woman reclines on stone steps near the waters edge, attended by a young boy who appears to be an enslaved individual. This juxtaposition is significant and warrants further consideration regarding power dynamics and societal structures of the time.
Further back, several women are depicted in elegant gowns, their postures conveying a sense of decorum and poise. A man stands slightly apart from the group, his gaze directed towards the woman in the dark blue gown, suggesting a familial or marital connection. The presence of another individual, darker-skinned than the rest, positioned near the left edge of the painting, further complicates the narrative; their role is ambiguous, but their inclusion speaks to the complexities of social hierarchies and labor practices prevalent during this period.
The landscape itself contributes significantly to the overall meaning. The manicured garden, with its precisely arranged foliage and architectural elements, reinforces the family’s wealth and control over their environment. The swan, a traditional symbol of grace and purity, adds an element of idealized beauty to the scene. However, the somewhat muted color palette and the slightly overcast sky introduce a note of melancholy or restraint, preventing the image from becoming overly celebratory.
The artists use of light is noteworthy; it highlights certain figures while leaving others in shadow, creating depth and drawing attention to specific relationships within the group. The overall effect is one of carefully orchestrated display, intended to convey not only individual identities but also a collective sense of lineage, prosperity, and social dominance. The inclusion of individuals from different backgrounds hints at the intricate web of dependencies that underpinned this apparent harmony.