Metropolitan Museum: part 3 – Claude Monet - Rouen Cathedral: The Portal (Sunlight)
Claude Monet: French, Paris 1840–1926 Giverny 1894; Oil on canvas; 39 1/4 x 25 7/8 in. (99.7 x 65.7 cm)
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The composition presents a monumental architectural structure, seemingly a cathedral facade, dominating the visual field. The artist has rendered it not with precise lines or detailed modeling, but through a dense application of brushstrokes that prioritize capturing the effects of light and atmosphere. A palpable sense of verticality is established by the towering spires and intricate tracery, though these are softened by the pervasive atmospheric haze.
The color palette is restrained, largely composed of variations on beige, cream, grey, and pale blue. These hues blend and shift across the surface, creating a shimmering effect that suggests sunlight filtering through mist or dust. The artist has employed a technique where individual brushstrokes retain their visibility, contributing to an overall impression of textural complexity rather than smooth surfaces. This approach obscures sharp outlines, dissolving the solidity of the building into a network of color relationships.
The portal itself is centrally positioned, its arched opening drawing the eye inward, though any potential depth within remains ambiguous due to the atmospheric perspective. The play of light across the stone surface emphasizes its unevenness and age; it’s not presented as an idealized or pristine structure but rather one weathered by time and environment.
Subtly, a sense of transience emerges. The buildings permanence is undermined by the fleeting nature of the light that defines it. It suggests that what we perceive isnt the inherent essence of the architecture, but its momentary appearance under specific conditions. This focus on ephemeral qualities implies an interest in capturing not just what is seen, but how it is seen – a subjective experience mediated by light and atmosphere. The work seems to be less about documenting a physical place and more about exploring the perceptual effects of light upon form.