Part 6 Louvre – Alexandre Denis Abel de Pujol -- Ixion enchained in Tartarus (Ixion enchainé dans le Tartare)
1824, 127х157
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Above him, another figure stands poised, wielding what appears to be a heavy mallet or hammer. This individual is also physically robust, displaying a classical idealization of the male form. He wears a simple garment draped over one shoulder, revealing his upper body and emphasizing his posture of dominance. His gaze is directed downwards towards the bound man, conveying an expression that blends severity with perhaps a degree of pity or resignation. The lighting highlights his face, drawing attention to this emotional complexity.
The background is shrouded in darkness, punctuated by hints of fiery light emanating from below. This creates a sense of depth and reinforces the impression of a subterranean prison – a realm of torment and eternal suffering. The limited color palette, dominated by browns, blacks, and muted reds, contributes to the overall atmosphere of gloom and despair.
The subtexts within this work revolve around themes of transgression, punishment, and divine justice. The bound figure’s posture suggests not only physical restraint but also a sense of defeat and humiliation. His vulnerability is starkly contrasted with the power displayed by his captor. The serpent, as a recurring symbol in mythology, likely represents temptation, deceit, or an inescapable fate. The act of striking – implied rather than explicitly shown – suggests a finality to the punishment, a consequence for actions that have incurred divine wrath.
The artist’s attention to anatomical detail and classical form suggests an engagement with established artistic traditions, while the subject matter points towards a narrative rooted in mythology or allegory. The scene evokes a sense of timelessness, suggesting that the depicted suffering is not limited to a specific historical context but speaks to universal human experiences of guilt, consequence, and redemption – or lack thereof.