Donato Bramante – Heraclitus and Democritus
1487-88. 102x187
Location: Pinacoteca di Brera, Milano.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 2 Ответы
А почему Гераклит в слезах (причем, слезы-огромные)? В то же время У Демокрита радостное выражение лица. Что они обсуждают?
Смею предположить, что оба философа обуждают человеческий быт и жизнь. Демокрит смеется над нелепостью человеческого существования, пока с другой стороны Гераклит оплакивает судьбу рода людского. Они как две стороны медали и в картине Браманте, как и у других авторов (к примуру Рубенса) изображено именно это коренное рзличие взгляда на человеческую участь двух философов.
You cannot comment Why?
On the left, a man with dark, curly hair and a wreath of foliage adorns his head. He wears a reddish-brown robe lined with fur, clasped at the shoulder. His hands are folded in his lap, and his gaze is directed forward, exhibiting an expression that appears to be one of melancholy or profound thought. The posture conveys introspection and perhaps resignation.
The figure on the right possesses lighter hair, styled in loose curls, and wears a white toga with purple trim. He gestures with his hand towards the globe, his mouth slightly open as if speaking or explaining something. His expression is more animated than that of his companion, suggesting an eagerness to communicate or a sense of intellectual excitement. A table laden with books and writing implements sits before him; these objects reinforce the association with scholarship and philosophical inquiry.
The architectural backdrop features a relief sculpture depicting figures engaged in various activities – some appear to be struggling, others are triumphant, while still others seem to observe the scene. This frieze introduces a narrative element, hinting at the complexities of human existence and the challenges inherent in understanding the world. The globe itself is rendered with a rudimentary depiction of landmasses, suggesting an early stage of cartographic knowledge.
The subtexts within this painting revolve around contrasting philosophical approaches. One figure embodies a contemplative, perhaps pessimistic worldview – symbolized by his somber expression and withdrawn posture. The other represents a more active, inquisitive stance – demonstrated through his gesture towards the globe and his animated countenance. The presence of the globe implies that their discussion concerns the nature of the universe and humanitys place within it. The relief sculpture above reinforces this idea, suggesting that human endeavors are fraught with both success and failure, joy and sorrow. Ultimately, the painting explores themes of knowledge, contemplation, and the inherent duality of existence.