Jonah beneath the Gourd Per Persson

The composition presents a scene divided into two distinct zones: a densely populated urban landscape and a more naturalistic setting on the right side. A decorative border frames the entire work, featuring repeating floral motifs that contribute to its overall ornamental quality.
Along the left edge, a row of buildings dominates the view. These structures are rendered with a degree of stylization; their facades are uniform in design, characterized by blue-grey walls and orange roofs topped with elaborate spires and finials. The repetition creates an impression of order and perhaps even uniformity or institutional power. Windows appear as dark rectangles, offering little insight into the interiors. A single flag is visible atop one of the buildings, suggesting a symbolic representation of authority or allegiance.
To the right of this architectural grouping, the scene transitions to a more pastoral environment. Here we see a large tree with abundant foliage, positioned near what appears to be an arched structure – possibly a gateway or ruin – partially obscured by vegetation. A figure is depicted beneath the trees shade, seemingly in a posture of repose or contemplation. The individual’s form is simplified and lacks detailed rendering, suggesting they are less important than their placement within the scene.
The color palette is restrained, primarily utilizing blues, greys, oranges, and greens. This limited range contributes to a sense of visual harmony but also restricts the potential for dramatic contrast or emotional intensity. The application of paint appears somewhat naive, with flat planes of color and minimal attempts at creating depth or perspective beyond the basic layering of elements.
The inscription above the scene suggests a narrative context – a reference to someone seeking shelter under the gourd. This detail introduces an element of biblical allusion, hinting at themes of protection, refuge, and perhaps divine intervention. The juxtaposition of the rigid urban structures with the more organic natural setting might be interpreted as a commentary on contrasting realms: civilization versus wilderness, constraint versus freedom, or even human endeavor against the forces of nature. The figure beneath the tree could represent someone seeking solace from the pressures of society, finding respite in a simpler existence. Overall, the work conveys a sense of quiet contemplation and symbolic meaning, achieved through its deliberate arrangement of forms and restrained use of color.