Edgar Degas – At the Milliner’s Metropolitan Museum: part 2
Metropolitan Museum: part 2 – Edgar Degas - At the Milliner’s
Edgar Degas: French, Paris 1834–1917 Paris 1881; Pastel on five pieces of wove paper, backed with paper, and laid down on canvas; 27 1/4 x 27 1/4 in. (69.2 x 69.2 cm); Pastels & Oil Sketches on Paper; The Walter H. and Leonore Annenberg Collection, Gift of Walter H. and Leonore Annenberg, 1997, Bequest of Walter H. Annenberg, 2002; 1997.391.1
Edit attribution
Download full size: 3586×3537 px (4,8 Mb)
Back to album: Metropolitan Museum: part 2
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
The woman’s posture is introspective; she leans forward, almost as if examining the hat for minute imperfections or assessing its suitability. Her expression remains largely unreadable, contributing to a sense of quiet contemplation rather than overt emotion. The meticulous detail afforded to the hat – its elaborate construction and delicate embellishments – contrasts with the more generalized treatment of her face, drawing focus to the object of her scrutiny.
The color palette is dominated by muted earth tones – browns, creams, and yellows – punctuated by the blue hues within the hat itself. The patterned cushion adds a touch of visual complexity without disrupting the overall harmony. Brushstrokes are visible throughout, lending a sense of immediacy and spontaneity to the work. This technique contributes to an impression of capturing a fleeting moment in time.
Subtly, the painting explores themes of consumerism and female identity within a burgeoning urban environment. The hat itself becomes symbolic – not merely as an accessory but as a marker of social status or personal style. The woman’s intense focus on this object suggests a preoccupation with appearances and societal expectations. Furthermore, her solitary posture and inward gaze imply a degree of isolation despite the implied proximity to the outside world. Theres a sense that she is engaged in a private ritual, one dictated by the conventions of her time and place. The work doesn’t offer definitive answers but rather invites consideration of the complexities inherent in female roles and material culture during this period.