Konstantin Makovsky – In the tavern
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
One man, positioned on the left, possesses a more rugged appearance. His dark beard and somewhat unkempt hair contrast sharply with the crispness of his white shirt. He’s intently focused on cracking open a crustacean – likely a lobster – using a small tool, demonstrating a practical, almost laborious approach to enjoying the meal. The light catches the planes of his face, highlighting a certain intensity in his gaze.
The other man, seated to the right, exhibits an air of jovial indulgence. His expression is one of amusement and satisfaction, with a broad smile revealing teeth stained by wine or food. He wears a similar white shirt but it’s more meticulously arranged, suggesting a greater attention to appearance. The way he holds his hand, almost gesturing towards the crustacean being prepared, implies a degree of detachment from the physical effort involved in consuming the meal.
The table itself is laden with provisions: several bottles of wine, additional crustaceans, and what appears to be bread or other accompaniments. A newspaper lies beneath the food, partially obscuring its content but hinting at an awareness of current events. The presence of a hat resting on the chair further reinforces the sense of a casual, everyday setting.
In the background, a framed portrait hangs on the wall, adding a layer of domesticity to the scene. Its subject is indistinct, yet it suggests a familial connection or perhaps a representation of social aspiration.
The lighting in the painting is crucial. It’s warm and diffused, creating a sense of conviviality while also emphasizing the textures of the fabrics and the sheen on the crustacean shells. The artist has skillfully employed chiaroscuro to sculpt the forms of the men, drawing attention to their individual characteristics.
Subtly, the work explores themes of class distinction and differing approaches to pleasure. The contrast between the two men’s demeanor and appearance suggests a commentary on social hierarchies or perhaps a playful observation of human nature – one man engaged in the practicalities of sustenance, the other reveling in its enjoyment. The overall impression is one of relaxed informality, capturing a fleeting moment of shared experience within a commonplace setting.