Part 1 Louvre – Phillippe de Champaigne -- Portrait of Cardinal Richelieu
c.1639, 222х155
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The figure’s posture is deliberate; he stands with a slight forward lean, one hand extended as if offering or gesturing towards the viewer. This gesture introduces an element of accessibility while simultaneously maintaining a sense of distance – a carefully constructed balance between approachability and power. The other hand rests upon his hip, contributing to a pose that suggests both confidence and control.
The face is characterized by a stern expression; the mouth is set in a firm line, and the eyes possess an intensity that conveys intelligence and perhaps even weariness. Fine lines etched around the eyes and mouth suggest age and experience, hinting at the burdens of responsibility carried by this individual. The hair, receding from the forehead, is neatly trimmed, further emphasizing a sense of order and discipline.
The backdrop, though visually complex, serves to isolate the figure and draw attention to his presence. Its intricate design – a tapestry-like arrangement of foliage and geometric motifs – is rendered in muted tones that do not compete with the vibrancy of the cardinal’s robes. The darkness surrounding the figure further enhances this effect, creating a sense of depth and emphasizing his prominence within the frame.
Subtleties within the painting suggest layers of meaning beyond a simple depiction of status. The slightly disheveled appearance of the cloak – a subtle crumple or fold – introduces an element of humanity to the otherwise imposing figure. It implies that even those in positions of great power are subject to the realities of human existence. The single, dropped glove lying on the cloak’s surface could be interpreted as a symbol of relinquished control or perhaps a deliberate gesture of humility, though its meaning remains open to interpretation. Overall, the work conveys an image of authority tempered by experience and subtly hinting at the complexities inherent in wielding significant power.