Lodgings for the Poor; Het huisvesten van de armen
Joost Cornelisz Droochsloot (1586-1666)
Joost Cornelisz Droochsloot – Lodgings for the Poor; Het huisvesten van de armen
1647. 100×140 cm
Location: Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
In the foreground, the artist depicts a cluster of people dressed in heavy, rustic garments. Here we see a palpable sense of communal hardship; men and women huddle together, some leaning on walking sticks, others seated upon the bare earth. The physical closeness of these figures suggests a shared destiny of poverty, yet there is no singular focus of action – instead, the scene captures a series of small, disconnected vignettes: a man gesturing toward another, a child tending to a dog, and weary travelers pausing in their transit.
Moving into the mid-ground, the density of the crowd thins, revealing a more expansive view of the landscape. The ruins continue into the distance, where skeletal arches and hollowed towers stand against a bright, expansive sky. This architectural decay serves as a silent metaphor for a fading era of prosperity, now repurposed to house those left on the margins of society. The light in this section of the painting is much brighter, washing over a sun-drenched field where smaller groups of figures move through the open space, creating a sense of continuity between the crowded foreground and the desolate horizon.
The subtext of the work lies in the tension between permanence and transience. The stone ruins represent a permanent, historical weight that remains even as the civilization that built them has collapsed. In contrast, the human presence is depicted as transient and fragile, defined by movement and survival. By placing these impoverished figures within the shells of grand architecture, the author highlights a poignant irony: the physical remnants of wealth and power have become nothing more than shelters for those stripped of it. The vast, indifferent sky and the enduring landscape further emphasize the insignificance of individual human suffering against the relentless march of time and decay.