Kunsthistorisches Museum – David Ryckaert III (1612-1662) -- Farmers’ Sufferings, or Plundering Soldiers
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a cluster of figures – civilians primarily – reacting with varying degrees of fear and resignation to the presence of the soldiers. Several women are positioned centrally, one offering a pitcher towards the invaders, seemingly in supplication or perhaps attempting to offer refreshment. Her posture, along with that of another woman kneeling nearby, conveys vulnerability and helplessness. The expressions on their faces – a mixture of anxiety and quiet despair – underscore the psychological toll of the intrusion. A young child clings to his mother, further emphasizing the disruption of familial security.
The soldiers themselves are portrayed as a heterogeneous group, some mounted on horseback, others disembarking or standing guard. Their attire suggests a mercenary force, lacking uniformity and displaying an air of casual brutality. One soldier, positioned prominently near the center, appears to be assessing the scene with detached curiosity rather than overt aggression, which subtly complicates any straightforward moral judgment. The artist did not present them as monolithic villains; instead, he explored the nuances within their ranks.
In the background, a village is engulfed in flames, adding another layer of devastation to the narrative. Smoke billows into the sky, obscuring the horizon and creating an atmosphere of impending doom. Scattered livestock – sheep and other animals – are depicted amidst the turmoil, symbolizing the broader disruption of rural life and economic stability. The presence of overturned barrels and scattered possessions reinforces this sense of loss and disorder.
The artist’s use of light and shadow contributes significantly to the emotional impact of the work. Areas of intense illumination highlight the faces of the civilians, drawing attention to their suffering, while darker tones shroud the soldiers and the burning village, creating a visual contrast between victimhood and aggression. The color palette is dominated by earthy tones – browns, yellows, and reds – which evoke a sense of hardship and decay.
Beyond the immediate depiction of violence, the painting seems to address themes of social injustice and the vulnerability of civilian populations during times of conflict. It suggests a commentary on the arbitrary nature of power and the devastating consequences of war upon those who are least able to defend themselves. The scene is not presented as an isolated incident but rather as a recurring pattern of exploitation and suffering, hinting at broader societal issues that extend beyond the immediate visual narrative.