Metropolitan Museum: part 2 – Attributed to Goya (Spanish, Fuendetodos 1746–1828 Bordeaux) - Bullfight in a Divided Ring
Attributed to Goya (Spanish, Fuendetodos 1746–1828 Bordeaux): Francisco de Goya y Lucientes Oil on canvas; 38 3/4 x 49 3/4 in. (98.4 x 126.4 cm)
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The central focus lies on the interaction between matadors and bulls within the arena itself. Two large bulls dominate the foreground, their dark forms contrasting with the lighter tones of the sand and the figures surrounding them. One bull is positioned near the lower edge of the composition, seemingly charging towards the viewer, while another stands further back, its posture suggesting a moment of pause or assessment. Matadors, identifiable by their distinctive attire, are scattered throughout the arena, engaging in maneuvers designed to control and ultimately subdue the bulls. A group of horsemen, also dressed for the occasion, appear to be assisting in guiding the animals.
The artist’s handling of light contributes significantly to the overall atmosphere. The sky is rendered with a diffused luminosity, casting a soft glow over the scene while simultaneously obscuring details within the distant background structures. This technique draws attention towards the immediate action and creates a sense of depth. Brushwork appears loose and expressive, particularly in the depiction of the crowd, where individual figures are suggested rather than meticulously detailed. This approach lends an immediacy to the scene, conveying the energy and chaos inherent in such a public event.
Beyond the straightforward portrayal of a bullfight, subtexts emerge concerning power dynamics and societal values. The spectacle itself can be interpreted as a symbolic representation of human dominance over nature, or perhaps a commentary on the ritualized violence that defines certain cultural practices. The sheer number of spectators underscores the widespread acceptance and even celebration of this form of entertainment. The artist’s choice to depict the event from an elevated perspective might suggest a critical distance, inviting viewers to contemplate the spectacles implications rather than simply revel in its excitement. The blurred details within the background buildings could also be read as a symbolic representation of the broader societal context that enables and perpetuates such traditions.