Metropolitan Museum: part 4 – Mather Brown - General George Eliott
Mather Brown: American, Boston, Massachusetts 1761–1831 London 1790; Oil on canvas; 98 3/16 x 64 3/8 in. (249.4 x 163.5 cm)
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The background is rendered in turbulent brushstrokes, depicting what appears to be an ongoing engagement. Flames rise from the lower portion of the scene, obscuring details but suggesting destruction and conflict. In the distance, a regiment of soldiers can be discerned, their red uniforms echoing the color scheme of the central figure’s attire. A flag bearing a distinctive emblem is partially visible at the left edge of the canvas, further reinforcing the military context. The sky above is dark, with hints of light breaking through, creating a sense of dramatic tension.
The artist employed chiaroscuro – a strong contrast between light and shadow – to highlight the central figure and create depth within the composition. Light falls primarily on his face and upper body, drawing attention to his expression: a mixture of determination and perhaps weariness. The darker tones in the background serve to isolate him, emphasizing his role as a leader amidst chaos.
Subtleties within the painting suggest more than just a straightforward depiction of military leadership. The gesture with the extended hand could be interpreted as an act of reassurance or a call to action for his troops. The inclusion of the battlefield scene, though somewhat obscured, implies that this is not merely a portrait but a record of a specific moment in time – a pivotal event where decisive action was required. The overall effect conveys a sense of both grandeur and burden; the man embodies power and responsibility within a context of potential loss and sacrifice. The subdued expression hints at the psychological toll of command, suggesting that his authority is not merely ceremonial but earned through experience and hardship.