National Gallery of Art – Edgar Degas - The Dance Lesson
C. 1879. Oil on canvas, 38 x 88 cm. Edgar Degas (French, 1834 1917). Credit: Courtesy National Gallery of Art, Washington.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artist has employed a muted palette dominated by earthy tones – browns, creams, and pale greens – which lends a certain realism to the setting while also softening the overall effect. Light enters from the right side of the frame, illuminating portions of the girls and casting shadows that define form and create depth. The light is not evenly distributed; it highlights specific figures and areas, drawing attention to their postures and expressions.
Several young women are seated on simple wooden chairs along the left wall, seemingly awaiting instruction or a break from practice. Their poses suggest weariness or quiet contemplation. A figure in the center foreground appears to be an instructor, her posture conveying authority while also exhibiting a degree of fatigue. She is positioned slightly apart from the group, observing their movements and perhaps correcting their form.
Further back, other girls are engaged in what seems to be a dance exercise, though the details of the movement remain somewhat ambiguous due to the distance and the painterly style. The arrangement creates a sense of depth, but also a feeling of being present as an unseen observer within this intimate space.
Subtleties within the work suggest themes beyond mere depiction of a dance lesson. The girls’ youthfulness and vulnerability are emphasized by their attire and postures. Their expressions, often obscured or averted, hint at a complex interplay of discipline, aspiration, and perhaps even exploitation. The instructors presence introduces an element of power dynamics – the relationship between mentor and student, authority and obedience.
The lack of a clear narrative focus encourages viewers to contemplate the everyday routines and social structures that shape these young women’s lives. The studio itself becomes symbolic of a space where dreams are nurtured but also where conformity and rigorous training are demanded. The overall impression is one of quiet observation, capturing a fleeting moment within a larger system of instruction and societal expectation.