National Gallery of Art – Sir Anthony van Dyck - Queen Henrietta Maria with Sir Jeffrey Hudson
1633. Oil on canvas, 219.1 x 134.8 cm. Sir Anthony van Dyck (Flemish, 1599 1641). Credit: Courtesy National Gallery of Art, Washington.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
To her left stands a young boy in vibrant red attire, his pose mirroring the woman’s formality yet imbued with a youthful energy. He holds what seems to be a small monkey on a leash, an unusual detail that introduces an element of playful eccentricity into the otherwise serious scene. The presence of this animal is significant; it could function as a symbol of exoticism, reflecting the expanding global trade and colonial ambitions of the era. It also potentially serves as a visual metaphor for the woman’s power – controlling even the most unconventional elements within her sphere of influence.
A large potted tree sits behind the woman, partially obscuring the architectural details of the background. The foliage is rendered with considerable detail, adding depth to the composition and contributing to the overall sense of opulence. To the right, a heavy gold curtain hangs, its folds meticulously painted to suggest weight and grandeur.
The lighting in this painting is carefully orchestrated; it illuminates the woman’s face and gown, drawing attention to her features and attire while leaving the background shrouded in shadow. This creates a dramatic effect, isolating the figures and enhancing their presence. The artist employed a subtle sfumato technique, softening edges and creating an atmospheric haze that contributes to the paintings overall elegance.
Beyond the surface depiction of wealth and status, there’s a suggestion of carefully constructed persona. The inclusion of the boy and monkey introduces a layer of complexity – perhaps hinting at a desire to project an image of both power and approachability, or even subtly commenting on the unusual circumstances surrounding his presence. The painting is not merely a representation of individuals; its a statement about social standing, cultural values, and the performative nature of identity in a courtly setting.