The Emperor Aulus Vitellius
Paolo Farinati (1524-1606)
Paolo Farinati – The Emperor Aulus Vitellius
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
In this drawing, the artist depicts a male figure of significant stature and authority, rendered in a style that combines precise line work with soft washes of brown ink and light shading. The subject is presented in a three-quarter view, standing with a sense of weighted permanence against a minimalist, architectural background.
The composition focuses on the physical presence of the man. He wears heavy, classical drapery – a thick cloak or paludamentum draped over his shoulders – which adds volume to his silhouette and suggests high social or military status. Beneath this, he is clad in a tunic and leggings that follow the contours of a sturdy, somewhat fleshy physique. His posture is assertive; one hand is pressed against his chest in a gesture that could imply devotion, resolve, or perhaps a reflexive guarding of the heart, while his other hand grips a baton or scepter, a clear symbol of command.
The artist’s treatment of the face conveys a complex psychological state. The figures expression is not one of serene triumph, but rather one of wary vigilance. His brow is slightly furrowed, and his eyes are directed toward something off-canvas, suggesting an awareness of external pressures or looming threats. There is a certain heaviness in the jaw and neck that lends the character a sense of groundedness, yet his gaze prevents him from appearing truly at peace.
Regarding the subtext, the inscription in the upper right corner – A·VITELIVS·GERMAN·IMP·AVG·P·M·TR – serves to anchor the figure within a specific historical and political framework of Roman imperial identity. The use of such formal titles suggests that this is not merely a portrait of an individual, but a study of power itself. The juxtaposition of the authoritative symbols (the baton and the imperial titles) with the subjects somewhat uneasy facial expression creates a tension between the permanence of the office and the precariousness of the man holding it. Here we see a depiction of leadership caught in a moment of scrutiny, where the weight of the mantle is visible in the very anatomy of the sitter.