"The West Against Russia" by Fyodor Dostoevsky, summary
The book, published in 2014, includes journalistic articles, travel essays, and programmatic texts by Fyodor Dostoevsky, written between 1861 and 1881. This book offers a profound understanding of the spiritual confrontation between Russian and Western European cultures, as well as a justification for pochvennichestvo (native-soil) as a way to overcome the centuries-old schism between the people and educated society. It is part of the "Russia and the West: Clash of Civilizations" series. This series also includes such fundamental works of Russian thought as "Russia and Europe" by Nikolai Danilevsky and "Byzantinism and Slavdom" by Konstantin Leontiev.
The Russian Enigma and European Misunderstanding
The book’s opening series of reflections is devoted to the distorted perception of Russia by its European neighbors. Western researchers conscientiously collect facts and figures, but are unable to grasp the essence of the Russian character. For Europeans, a Russian remains either a barbarian or a blind imitator, having traded his caftan for German dress thanks to the reforms of Peter the Great.
A foreigner approaches Russian reality with his own preconceived standards. A German observer displays arrogance and suspicion toward phenomena of a different nature. A French traveler draws conclusions while still in Paris, noticing only superficial details in Moscow and St. Petersburg and confusing Russian realities with the exoticism of foreign islands. The reason for this alienation lies in the profound difference in their fundamental principles.
European nations have become locked within the confines of their own national egoism. The English and the French are unable to truly understand each other due to their mutual rivalry. The Russian is endowed with a universal responsiveness and the ability to synthesize. He easily learns foreign languages, embraces the spirit of other cultures, and is capable of combining opposing ideas.
Peter the Great’s reforms allowed Russian society to embrace European science. Now comes the time to return to our native soil. Here, the class feud between victors and vanquished characteristic of the West is absent. The first step toward unity must be the selfless dissemination of literacy among the common people.
The Parisian bourgeois and the London Baal
In travelogues from his 1862 trip abroad, the author explores the underbelly of Western European progress. Berlin seems a pale imitation of St. Petersburg, and Cologne Cathedral is overshadowed by the obsessive commerce of cologne. The main objects of his research are Paris and London, the two centers of European bourgeois civilization.
Paris is striking in its outward decorum, which conceals spiritual degeneration. Society is ruled undivided by the bourgeois — the property owner who has made the accumulation of money the highest virtue. French life is subject to strict regimentation, theatrical eloquence, and ostentatious nobility. The slogans of the Great Revolution about freedom and equality, in fact, belong only to those who own millions.
Brotherhood cannot be imposed by reason or socialist calculations. True brotherhood demands the complete and voluntary dedication of the individual to society, without the demand for mutual benefit. Western individualism, by contrast, defends rights with sword in hand. Fear of social upheaval forces the bourgeoisie to hide behind the military dictatorship of Napoleon III and find solace in family melodramas.
London presents a grand and grim contrast. The spirit of industrial Baal reigns here, embodied in the Crystal Palace of the Great Exhibition. Next to the dazzling wealth of the City, huddled the slums of Whitechapel and the nightly crowds of outcasts on the streets of Haymarket. The people seek oblivion in poisonous gin and religious sects, and Anglican pastors minister exclusively to the wealthy.
The Eastern Crisis and Spiritual Calling
Reflections on the Eastern Crisis and the war of 1877–1878 reveal the author’s views on foreign policy. The Russo-Turkish campaign began to liberate Balkan Christians from centuries-old oppression. Ordinary people embraced this campaign as a sacred "Orthodox cause," demanding sacrifice and selflessness.
Europe met Russian actions with hostility and suspicion. Western powers refused to believe in Russia’s selflessness, ascribing to it designs for conquest and defending the integrity of the Ottoman Empire. British Prime Minister Beaconsfield cynically denounced General Mikhail Chernyaev’s volunteers as destructive elements. European policy measured everything by short-term market profits, turning a blind eye to the brutal extermination of civilians.
The liberated Slavic peoples will have to endure a long period of political temptations. Having gained independence, they will inevitably rush to adopt Western parliamentary forms, quarrel among themselves, and seek the patronage of the great powers. Russia should not demand immediate gratitude from them. Its historical task is to guard their freedom and serve the moral unification of all Orthodoxy.
Constantinople must eventually come under Russian control to become the spiritual center of the Eastern world. Attempts to make it a neutral city would turn the Straits into an arena of constant intrigue and strife between the Greeks and Slavs. Only the authority of a strong Orthodox power could prevent a schism in the Church and ensure lasting peace in the East.
Global Confrontations and the Vector of Development
An analysis of European conflicts reveals the continent’s profound instability. Germany achieved unification through blood and iron, yet its internal unity remains fragile. Chancellor Otto von Bismarck recognizes the danger of Roman Catholicism, which seeks to maintain global dominance at any cost.
Having lost the support of earthly monarchs, the papacy is ready to appeal to the democratic masses. The Vatican is capable of offering dispossessed workers a perverted form of Christianity that justifies the seizure of property and violence in the name of an earthly paradise. France, conquered by the clerical party under Marshal Patrice de MacMahon, is becoming a docile tool of the Roman idea, creating the threat of a new pan-European war.
Russian liberal Europeanism contains a hidden contradiction. Seeking to imitate the West, Russian Westernizers align themselves with extreme leftist movements that reject the European bourgeois system. This paradox is explained by a vibrant Russian instinct: the soul protests against alien forms of civilization while maintaining a yearning for higher justice.
Russia needs to recognize its independence and turn its attention to the East. The development of Siberia and Turkestan will bring the country enormous economic and spiritual renewal. The construction of railways deep into Asia will unlock the region’s vast wealth and create opportunities for enterprising people tired of the inactivity of the European part of the empire.
Popular Literacy and the Legacy of the Classics
The articles in this literary-critical series examine ways to educate the nation. A chasm of mutual misunderstanding has developed between the educated classes and the peasantry. To overcome this alienation, the upper classes need to introduce the basics of scientific knowledge and the alphabet, rather than impose foreign concepts on the people.
In a polemic with the journal "Otechestvennye Zapiski," the genuine national character of Alexander Pushkin’s work is defended. The poet was the first to embody the Russian type of thinking man — Eugene Onegin, suffering from isolation from his native soil and the inability to find a meaningful purpose. Through Pushkin, Russian culture revealed the beauty of the national character and the ideal of universal human unity.
Nikolai Strakhov’s defense of the Polish uprising concludes the book with a polemic against the newspaper Moskovskie Vedomosti. Polish civilization suffered its historical collapse precisely because of its aristocratic and Catholic character, hostile to Slavic national principles. Russia possesses its own centuries-old foundations that define its special place in world history.
You cannot comment Why?