На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
Скорее всего, это арки. Но под другим углом здесь можно увидеть восстание колгот теплых оттенков...
You cannot comment Why?
The application of paint seems deliberate, with clear outlines defining each form. There is little evidence of blending or softening; instead, the shapes are presented as distinct entities, contributing to a sense of fragmentation and disjunction. The layering creates an illusion of spatial recession, though it remains ambiguous whether this represents a literal cityscape or a more symbolic construction.
The absence of recognizable figures or naturalistic details shifts the focus away from narrative representation towards formal concerns. This emphasis on shape, color, and structure suggests an exploration of underlying architectural principles or perhaps a deconstruction of conventional perspectives. The arrangement feels both rigid and dynamic; while the forms are geometrically precise, their overlapping and irregular placement introduce a visual tension.
Subtly, one might interpret this as a commentary on urban environments – the anonymity of modern architecture, the sense of alienation within densely populated spaces, or even the breakdown of traditional structures. The lack of clear perspective and the compressed composition could also be read as an expression of psychological complexity or emotional turmoil. Ultimately, the work resists easy interpretation, inviting viewers to engage with its formal qualities and construct their own meanings from the interplay of shapes and colors.