Juan Gris – portrait of the artists mother 1912
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
THE MILL OF CRUELTY
The mill of cruelty has ground
Many minds to dust.
Each nuance and shade of pain
Creates a story in this hellish world.
How harsh are people, those relics of the Old Testament?
To maim is simply a step
In logic when no word of virtue is heard,
And the soul turns to stone.
The executions of ancient Egypt – wild,
Terrible in their vivid sophistication.
A feast for crocodiles – and daylight fades.
Life unfolds in shades of guilt.
How crowds were gathered for executions in the Middle Ages!
The executioner fanned the flames.
Bones cracked under blows,
And lamentations thickened into a cloud.
... Boys on a wasteland chase
A cat with a football. Their laughter is cruel.
They laugh and commit offenses.
Cruelty flows with the ages.
Yes, it flows – cruelty has become shallow:
We no longer go to watch executions.
The mill of cruelty skillfully
Destroys the light and abolishes death!
Or am I a hostage to illusions?
But we strive for spiritual growth, even just a little.
It is impossible to develop into angels,
But at least let us understand the essence of light.
You cannot comment Why?
The artist has employed a limited tonal range, which contributes to a sense of austerity and introspection. The subdued colors reinforce the feeling of emotional restraint, suggesting a focus on internal character rather than outward appearance. Light falls unevenly across the planes, creating sharp contrasts that emphasize the fractured nature of the form.
A palpable tension exists within the arrangement. The angularity suggests dynamism, but this is tempered by the overall stillness and lack of clear spatial depth. Theres an impression of a psychological portrait rather than a straightforward likeness; it’s as if the artist sought to convey not just what the subject looked like, but also something about her inner state or essence.
The absence of overt emotional expression in the figure’s features contributes to this ambiguity. The planes that might suggest eyes and mouth are reduced to abstract shapes, denying the viewer a direct connection with the subjects personality. This deliberate withholding invites speculation and encourages an active engagement from the observer. It is possible to interpret the fragmentation as a reflection of a complex or troubled relationship, or perhaps as a broader commentary on the instability of identity itself. The work seems less concerned with depicting a person than with exploring the very nature of representation and perception.