Unknown painters – Charles I of England
Location: National Museum (Nationalmuseum), Stockholm.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 4 Ответы
Что не так с это картиной?
Грубый новодел, на плоскости. Возможно тоже тут с целью провенанса
This painting is part of the main collection at the Stockholm museum and is not contemporary, although it lacks a date. If you were to place a mirrored column in front of it, I believe you would see a reflection based on the swirling patterns depicted.
I tried to find it on the museums website. There are many serious inconsistencies, but pointing them out would mean having to correct errors later. Im giving one example: The author seems accustomed to imitating the age of the metal without delving into details like the rank system, similar to what happened with the prince before. And there are numerous technical discrepancies here, including the type of wood and the method of parquet flooring used.
I think its probably around forty years old, but the museums scientific department has the resources to determine that more precisely.
You cannot comment Why?
The composition presents a striking and unsettling visual paradox. A mans head, rendered with meticulous detail in terms of facial features and hair texture, appears to be embedded within a sphere or orb. The perspective is unusual; the viewer confronts the subject at an oblique angle, creating a sense of disorientation and confinement.
The man’s expression is one of weary resignation, his gaze directed downwards, suggesting introspection or perhaps sorrow. His attire – a dark garment with elaborate lace detailing and a ribbon bearing a medallion – hints at status and authority, though these are undermined by the overall atmosphere of melancholy and decay. The meticulous rendering of the facial features contrasts sharply with the more generalized treatment of the surrounding sphere.
Within this sphere, a central motif dominates: a golden disc upon which a skull is prominently displayed. This immediately introduces themes of mortality, transience, and the inevitability of death. The skull acts as a memento mori, a reminder of human impermanence, directly confronting the viewer with the fragility of life, regardless of rank or power.
The sphere itself can be interpreted in several ways. It might represent the world, trapping the individual within its confines and subjecting him to its relentless cycle of existence. Alternatively, it could symbolize an inescapable fate, a prison from which there is no escape. The dark background further intensifies this sense of enclosure and isolation.
The artist’s choice to integrate the portrait into this symbolic sphere creates a powerful commentary on power, mortality, and the human condition. It suggests that even those in positions of authority are ultimately subject to the same universal truths as everyone else – the inevitability of death and the limitations imposed by existence. The painting is not merely a depiction of an individual; it’s a meditation on the broader themes of life, loss, and the passage of time.