Pavel Filonov – #15155
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
A WORD ABOUT STALIN
Did he recall the mountain village?
The seminary, where the whiteness
Of the walls seemed to symbolize
The purity of souls?
Perhaps he remembered evenings,
Tasting power and sipping cognac.
He examined power – saw it all,
Down to its very core.
And darkness thickened.
The leaders yellow eyes gleam.
Smoke from the pipe is sweet and heavy.
Stalin is loved throughout the country -
Is love necessary when one is powerful?
He crushed everyone, brought them to their knees,
Surrounded the country with barbed wire.
He forced everyone to realize he was a genius,
To feel guilty before him.
Power begets power. Swollen with authority, greedy,
He drinks from chalices of subterranean kinship.
From black chalices. And eternally gloomy.
And his words fall with an accent.
Always night. He lives only at night.
A grasping mind, full of cunning.
The leader loves fruit – and everything juicy.
He loves it – intoxicated by long-drawn blood.
Very little is known about him.
Here is a portrait of empty pomp.
And now – to go back: Stalins call
To the light.
Do not tear out the barb
Of evil that constantly stings us.
So absurd is this call to go back...
You cannot comment Why?
The color palette is restrained; earthy tones – browns, greens, and muted reds – form the background and clothing, drawing attention solely to the subject’s face. Light falls upon him from the left, creating subtle highlights that define his features and add a degree of three-dimensionality. The collar appears stiff and formal, suggesting an official or leadership role.
Beyond the straightforward depiction, the painting carries significant subtexts related to power and control. The frontal pose eliminates any sense of vulnerability or distance; the subject is presented as accessible yet unyielding. The meticulous rendering suggests a desire for permanence and idealization – a deliberate construction of image rather than a spontaneous representation. This careful crafting implies an intent to project strength, reliability, and perhaps even infallibility.
The absence of any contextual elements – no background scenery or symbolic objects – reinforces the focus on the individual’s persona. The painting functions as a tool for creating an aura of authority, designed to inspire respect and obedience through visual representation. It is not merely a likeness; its a carefully constructed symbol intended to convey specific ideological messages.