На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The hair, also rendered in sharp, spiky formations, mirrors this duality, appearing both naturalistic and deliberately artificial. The figure is clad in what appears to be a dark green garment, its texture suggested through broad brushstrokes that create an impression of depth and folds. Behind the subject, a blurred background of warm colors – ochres, siennas, and hints of red – provides a muted backdrop, preventing it from distracting from the central figure but adding a sense of atmosphere.
The subtexts within this work seem to revolve around themes of duality, identity, and perhaps even fragmentation. The split face suggests an exploration of opposing forces or aspects of personality – reason versus instinct, appearance versus reality, or perhaps the conflict between humanity and something other. The pipe held by the figure could symbolize contemplation, habit, or a form of escapism. The overall effect is one of psychological complexity; the subject appears to be simultaneously familiar and alien, inviting viewers to consider the multifaceted nature of identity and the potential for internal division. Theres an underlying sense of melancholy conveyed through the subject’s gaze and the muted color scheme, hinting at a narrative or experience that lies just beyond immediate comprehension.