Leonid Afremov – Leonid Afremov 122
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The palette is characterized by bold contrasts: deep blues and purples define the sky and shadowed areas, while oranges, yellows, and reds saturate the foreground and building facades. This chromatic intensity creates an atmosphere both festive and slightly melancholic. The application of paint is thick and impastoed, lending a tactile quality to the surface and emphasizing the dynamism of light and movement.
Several figures are discernible along the street; they appear as dark silhouettes huddled beneath umbrellas, suggesting a protective response to the implied rain. Their presence introduces an element of human scale within the expansive urban landscape, yet their anonymity contributes to a sense of detachment and quiet observation. The bare branches of trees frame the scene on either side, adding a starkness that contrasts with the warmth of the artificial lights. These skeletal forms also suggest a season – likely late autumn or winter – further reinforcing the feeling of solitude.
The reflections in the wet pavement are not merely decorative; they actively distort and multiply the light sources, creating an almost dreamlike quality. The buildings themselves appear to be rendered with a degree of abstraction, their shapes simplified and colored in broad strokes that prioritize emotional impact over precise representation.
Subtly, the painting conveys a sense of longing or introspection. While the scene is visually stimulating, there’s a quietness about it – a feeling of being an observer rather than a participant. The vibrant colors might be interpreted as a means to mask a deeper undercurrent of loneliness or contemplation within the urban environment. Ultimately, the work seems to explore the interplay between artificiality and nature, light and shadow, and the individual’s place within a bustling yet impersonal city.