Alexander Ivanov – Joseph’s brothers find a bowl in Benjamin’s bag
1831-1833. 37×57
Location: The State Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow (Государственная Третьяковская галерея).
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The scene unfolds around a young man, positioned near the center-left, who appears to be the focus of the accusation. He is being examined or restrained by several figures, one of whom forcefully holds his arms. A bowl, seemingly the object of contention, lies on the ground nearby, drawing attention to its significance in the unfolding narrative.
The artist has employed a palette dominated by earth tones – ochres, browns, and muted greens – which contribute to the sense of arid landscape and heightened emotional intensity. The lighting is uneven, with strong highlights illuminating certain figures while leaving others shrouded in shadow, further emphasizing the dramatic nature of the event. A large palm tree looms over the group, its presence suggesting a setting within a Middle Eastern or North African environment.
Beyond the immediate narrative of accusation, several subtexts emerge from the painting. The varied expressions and postures of the men suggest complex relationships – familial bonds strained by betrayal, authority figures grappling with difficult decisions, and individuals caught in a web of deceit. The bowl itself functions as a potent symbol, representing not only material possession but also trust, loyalty, and potentially, divine providence.
The composition’s arrangement directs the viewers eye to the central figure and the accused young man, creating a focal point for the unfolding drama. The use of gesture and facial expression is particularly effective in conveying the emotional weight of the moment, inviting speculation about the events that led up to this confrontation and the consequences that will follow. The overall effect is one of heightened tension and moral ambiguity, leaving the viewer to ponder the complexities of human relationships and the fragility of trust.