На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Two men, dressed in attire indicative of a lower social class – one in a red jacket and breeches, the other with a white shirt and darker trousers – are physically restraining a third individual. The man being restrained is notable for his partial nudity and the presence of rudimentary wings attached to his back. His posture conveys distress and resistance; he leans away from his captors, his body contorted in an attempt to escape their grasp.
The two men holding him exhibit expressions of determination or perhaps even malicious glee. Their grip on his arms is firm, suggesting a deliberate act of subjugation rather than a spontaneous altercation. The use of long poles by the men seems intended to further immobilize the winged figure and maintain control over him.
Behind the immediate struggle, another man in formal attire – a dark coat and what appears to be a clerical collar – observes the scene with an expression that is difficult to decipher; it could suggest disapproval or detached curiosity. He stands slightly apart from the action, creating a sense of distance and perhaps implying a role as witness rather than participant.
The buildings lining the street are rendered in detail, their windows reflecting light and adding depth to the composition. The architectural style suggests a period characterized by classical influences and urban development.
Subtextually, the painting seems to explore themes of societal power dynamics, persecution, or perhaps even satire. The winged figure’s partial nudity and vulnerability suggest a state of exposure and marginalization. His wings could be interpreted as symbolic of aspiration, freedom, or divine inspiration – qualities that are being forcibly suppressed by those in authority. The formal attire of the observer hints at a system of governance or social order that permits, or even encourages, such treatment. The scene’s ambiguity allows for multiple interpretations; it might represent a literal depiction of an event, or function as an allegorical commentary on human nature and societal structures.