David Wingrove – ger-DavidWingrove-I-Robot
Album navigation:

На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
In the foreground, a complex assemblage of metallic forms dominates the view. These structures are not merely decorative; they seem to be components of a larger machine or robotic system, suggesting an ongoing process of creation or repair. The polished surfaces reflect light in a way that emphasizes their manufactured nature and adds to the feeling of coldness.
Two figures occupy the middle ground. A woman stands with her arms crossed, observing the scene with a posture that conveys both authority and detachment. Her attire – a pristine white uniform – reinforces the impression of a controlled environment and professional expertise. To her right, a man is actively engaged in adjusting or calibrating a large, humanoid robot. His focused expression suggests a deep involvement in the technological process, while his lab coat mirrors the woman’s uniform, indicating a shared role within this setting.
The robot itself is a striking element. Its metallic head and torso are rendered with meticulous detail, highlighting its intricate construction. The posture of the robot – slightly tilted forward – suggests a state of readiness or anticipation.
Behind the figures, a wall is covered in technical diagrams and schematics, further emphasizing the scientific context. A framed portrait hangs above this display, adding an unexpected layer of complexity to the scene. Its presence introduces a sense of history or tradition within this technologically advanced setting, perhaps hinting at the legacy of innovation that has led to the creation of these machines.
Subtly, the painting explores themes of human agency and technological dependence. The figures’ detached observation raises questions about their relationship with the robot they are creating – are they masters or servants? The coldness of the metallic forms contrasts sharply with the potential for warmth and connection inherent in human interaction. The portrait on the wall suggests a tension between past traditions and future possibilities, prompting reflection on the impact of technological progress on humanitys identity and values. Ultimately, the work invites contemplation about the ethical implications of artificial intelligence and the evolving relationship between humans and machines.