Nature #369 Rien Poortvliet (1932-1995)

The composition presents a scene of rural activity, dominated by autumnal hues and a sense of restrained movement. Here we see a landscape divided into distinct planes: a foreground of tall grasses and reeds bordering a small body of water, a middle ground featuring two figures engaged in what appears to be hunting, and a distant horizon line punctuated by low hills.
The central focus is drawn to the pheasant taking flight from the edge of the water. Its plumage displays vibrant color – a striking contrast against the muted browns and yellows that characterize much of the scene. The bird’s trajectory cuts diagonally across the composition, creating a dynamic visual path for the viewers eye. A hunting dog, positioned on the right side of the frame, is captured mid-stride, its posture suggesting anticipation and alertness.
The two figures in the middle ground are rendered with less detail, their forms somewhat indistinct against the backdrop of the landscape. They appear to be coordinating their actions, one raising a hand as if signaling or aiming. Their presence introduces an element of human intervention into the natural environment. The placement of these individuals suggests a deliberate orchestration of the hunt, rather than a spontaneous encounter with wildlife.
The artist’s use of color is notable. A palette of earthy tones – ochre, umber, and sienna – predominates, evoking a feeling of late autumn or early winter. The application of paint appears loose and gestural, contributing to an overall impression of immediacy and spontaneity. Theres a softness in the rendering that avoids sharp outlines, blending elements together and creating atmospheric depth.
Subtly embedded within this depiction is a commentary on humanity’s relationship with nature. While the scene portrays a seemingly idyllic rural setting, it also acknowledges the inherent tension between human activity and the natural world. The hunt itself symbolizes a form of control over wildlife, while the landscape serves as both a backdrop and a resource for human pursuits. The painting doesnt overtly condemn this interaction; rather, it presents it as an observed reality, prompting reflection on the complexities of coexistence.