Joachim Wtewael – The Judgment of Paris
1602. 15,4 x 20,5
Location: The Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The composition is characterized by dynamic movement and a sense of theatricality. The goddesses are not arranged statically; rather, they appear to be caught mid-gesture, their bodies twisting and leaning in attempts to capture the attention of the judging figure. One goddess reclines languidly on a pile of fruit and drapery, her gaze directed towards the central figure with an air of seductive confidence. Another rises gracefully, extending a hand as if offering herself for consideration. The third appears more assertive, almost challenging, her posture conveying a sense of entitlement.
The artist has employed a rich palette dominated by warm tones – reds, golds, and browns – which contribute to the overall feeling of opulence and heightened emotion. Light is used strategically to highlight key figures and details, creating a chiaroscuro effect that intensifies the drama. The background recedes into a murky darkness, punctuated by glimpses of distant architecture, further emphasizing the focus on the central group.
Several subtexts emerge from this arrangement. The scene seems to explore themes of beauty, desire, and power. The judging figure’s role is ambiguous; he appears both empowered and burdened by his task. The goddesses embody different facets of feminine allure – sensuality, grace, and assertiveness – suggesting a complex negotiation of influence and status.
The presence of numerous smaller figures – satyrs, nymphs, and other mythological creatures – adds another layer to the narrative. They seem to be witnesses or participants in this momentous occasion, their expressions ranging from amusement to anticipation. Their inclusion reinforces the sense that this is not merely an individual judgment but a significant event with wider implications for the world beyond the immediate scene. The overall impression is one of heightened tension and impending consequence, hinting at the potential for disruption and conflict arising from the decision about to be made.