Master of Affligem – Joseph is pushed by the brothers in the pit, Josephs coat is coated by the Brethren with goats blood

The circular composition presents a dramatic scene unfolding within a pastoral landscape. Here we observe a group of men engaged in what appears to be a forceful act – pushing a central figure downwards into a pit. The individual being propelled exhibits a posture of resistance and distress, his hands raised as if attempting to ward off the impending descent. He is clad in an elaborate green tunic with gold detailing, suggesting a position of relative status or importance.
The men surrounding him are dressed in a variety of garments, indicative of differing social standings within their community. Several wear dark caps and cloaks, while others sport lighter attire and carry what appear to be spears or staffs. A particularly striking detail is the crimson staining on one of the cloths held by a man positioned near the pit’s edge; this suggests an attempt to disguise something – potentially blood – and introduces a layer of deceit into the narrative. The use of goats blood, as indicated in the context, reinforces this sense of calculated manipulation and deception.
The background is populated with additional figures, some observing from a distance atop a small rise. These onlookers contribute to the overall feeling of public spectacle and judgment. A scattering of livestock – sheep, goats, and cattle – populates the right side of the scene, adding to the rural setting but also potentially symbolizing innocence or vulnerability in contrast to the actions taking place.
The artist’s use of light is significant. The central figure is illuminated, drawing immediate attention to his plight, while shadows obscure some of the faces of those involved in pushing him, hinting at their complicity and perhaps a degree of shame or fear. The color palette is dominated by earthy tones – browns, greens, and reds – which contribute to the scene’s somber mood.
Subtextually, the painting explores themes of betrayal, sibling rivalry, and injustice. The act itself suggests a deliberate attempt to remove someone from power or influence, while the subsequent covering with blood implies an effort to conceal wrongdoing. The presence of onlookers highlights the societal implications of such actions – the potential for both condemnation and complicity within a community. The landscape setting, seemingly idyllic, is juxtaposed against the harsh reality of human conflict, creating a sense of unease and moral ambiguity.