James Stephanoff – Falstaff at Herne’s Oak, from The Merry Wives of Windsor, Act V, Scene v
1832. 45×37
Location: Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection, New Haven.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see three figures engaged in an awkward interaction. The central figure, a stout man clad in elaborate Elizabethan attire – a yellow doublet, puffed sleeves, and breeches – is being approached by two women. One woman, positioned directly in front of him, appears to be playfully touching his face with a gesture that is both intimate and mocking. Her dark dress contrasts sharply with the other woman’s vibrant red gown, creating a visual distinction between them. The second woman stands slightly behind the first, her expression mirroring the amusement evident on her companions face.
The man’s posture conveys a mixture of confusion and discomfort. His gaze is directed towards the woman touching his face, while his body leans away from her as if attempting to disengage. A chain dangles loosely from his belt, hinting at an earlier predicament or restraint – a key element in the narrative context. Several dogs are visible near the second woman’s feet, adding a touch of domesticity and further emphasizing the comedic nature of the situation.
The artist employed a dramatic use of light and shadow to heighten the sense of mystery and absurdity. The moonlight casts an ethereal glow on the scene, while the surrounding foliage obscures much of the background, creating a claustrophobic atmosphere. This interplay of illumination and darkness contributes to the overall feeling that something is amiss, reinforcing the subtext of deception and mistaken identity inherent in the play’s plot.
The composition suggests a moment of revelation or exposure – a public humiliation played out under the watchful eye of the moon. The womens expressions and gestures imply they are orchestrating this encounter for their own amusement, while the man’s bewildered reaction underscores his vulnerability and naivete. The painting captures a pivotal moment of comedic chaos, hinting at the larger narrative of trickery and social satire that defines the play.