Rafael De Penagos – #12230
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Two men are depicted wielding scythes, their movements suggested through dynamic lines that convey exertion and rhythm. Their postures are angled towards each other, creating a sense of shared effort. A third figure, positioned centrally and larger than the others, stands with his arms raised, seemingly gesturing or observing the work. This central figure’s darker skin tone contrasts sharply with the lighter complexion of the two laborers, potentially hinting at a social hierarchy or difference in status within the agricultural community. He wears a wide-brimmed hat that casts shadows across his face, adding to an air of authority.
The text overlayed on the image provides crucial context: MUTUA DE SEGUROS AGRICOLAS, indicating this is an advertisement for agricultural insurance. Further textual elements detail the founding organization and location (FUNDADA POR LA AGRUPACION DE PROPIETARIOS DE FINCAS RUSTICAS DE ESPAÑA, Santa Catalina, 7. Madrid) and a statement assuring workers protection against work-related accidents. The inclusion of this last phrase suggests an attempt to appeal directly to the laborers themselves, framing the insurance as a benefit.
The artist employed a simplified, almost blocky style reminiscent of early Soviet propaganda posters or constructivist design. This aesthetic choice lends the image a sense of urgency and purpose. The bold colors and strong lines contribute to its visual impact, intended to capture attention and convey a message quickly.
Subtly, the painting raises questions about power dynamics within rural Spain. While ostensibly promoting worker protection, the depiction of the darker-skinned figure as an overseer or authority figure introduces a layer of complexity. The image might be interpreted not only as a straightforward advertisement but also as a commentary on social structures and labor relations in the agricultural sector.