На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The lighting is carefully orchestrated to highlight certain elements while leaving others in shadow. The table setting receives considerable illumination, emphasizing the opulence of their surroundings, yet this brightness contrasts with the subdued expressions on the faces of the couple. A dog, likely a greyhound or similar breed, stands attentively near the table, its gaze directed towards the pair; it seems to embody a quiet loyalty and perhaps an awareness of the emotional undercurrents within the room.
In the background, partially obscured by a decorative screen, a figure in servant’s attire holds a tray, observing the scene with what appears to be a mixture of deference and concern. This presence introduces a subtle element of social hierarchy and reinforces the sense that this is a privileged domestic space. The placement of the servant also creates depth within the composition, drawing the viewers eye further into the room.
The overall atmosphere evokes a feeling of ennui or quiet despair. While the setting suggests comfort and luxury, the body language of the couple implies an underlying dissatisfaction or emotional distance. The abundance of silver and fruit could be interpreted as symbols of wealth that fail to bring happiness. The painting’s subtexts suggest themes of societal expectations, marital discord, and the fleeting nature of pleasure within a world of material possessions. The artists skillful use of light and shadow contributes significantly to this nuanced portrayal of domestic life.