James Thornhill – Allegory of the Power of Great Britain by Sea, design for a decorative panel for George I’s ceremonial room
c.1720. 46×53
Location: Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection, New Haven.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Flanking this central element are figures drawn from classical mythology, integrated to legitimize and amplify the contemporary political message. On the left stands a female figure in Roman military attire, identifiable as Minerva or a similar embodiment of strategic wisdom and warfare. She gestures towards the ship with an air of approval and guidance. To her right, another female figure, possibly Britannia, holds aloft what appears to be a laurel branch, symbolizing victory and prosperity.
On the opposite side, Neptune, god of the sea, rises from the water, wielding his trident. His posture conveys both authority and control over the maritime realm. Surrounding him in the lower portion of the composition are several male figures struggling within the waves – these likely represent defeated enemies or conquered territories, visually demonstrating Britain’s triumph over its rivals at sea.
Above this scene, a radiant female figure descends from the clouds, attended by cherubic figures. This celestial presence reinforces the notion of divine favor and blessing upon British naval endeavors. The light emanating from her suggests an endorsement of the nations power and ambition.
A heraldic shield is prominently positioned between the two female figures. Its inscription, though partially obscured, likely contains a motto or declaration affirming Britain’s imperial claims and values. The inclusion of this emblem serves to ground the mythological narrative within a specific historical context, linking divine sanction with national identity.
The color palette contributes significantly to the paintings overall effect. Rich blues and golds dominate the upper portion, evoking a sense of grandeur and celestial authority. In contrast, the lower section utilizes darker tones to depict the turmoil of conflict and subjugation. The artist’s use of light and shadow further enhances the dramatic impact of the scene, drawing attention to key figures and symbolic elements.
The painting functions as more than just a decorative panel; it is a carefully constructed visual argument for Britains naval supremacy and its divinely ordained right to rule the seas. It combines classical iconography with contemporary political messaging to create a powerful statement about national identity and imperial ambition.