Jacobus Buys – Scene from Pefroen with the sheep’s head; Scene uit Pefroen met het schaapshoofd
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
In the foreground, two men are engaged in a physical altercation. One, dressed in a light-colored coat and breeches, appears to be actively pushing the other, who wears darker attire and a tricorn hat. The man being pushed attempts to defend himself by raising his hand to his head, suggesting an attempt to ward off the assault or perhaps a gesture of surprise and indignation. A small wooden chest lies open near their feet, its contents obscured but potentially significant to the unfolding event.
Behind them, positioned slightly to the left, stands a group of three onlookers. Their expressions range from concern to amusement, hinting at a detached observation of the preceding scene. The figure closest to the action displays an exaggerated expression of shock or dismay, while the others appear more restrained in their reactions. One man is dressed in a white coat and appears to be gesturing towards the altercation.
The architectural backdrop establishes a sense of place – likely an urban setting with well-maintained buildings featuring symmetrical windows and doorways. A tall column rises behind the central figures, partially obscuring a tree whose branches extend upwards, adding a touch of naturalism to the otherwise formal environment. The perspective suggests that the viewer is positioned across the street from the action, allowing for a comprehensive view of the scene.
The subtexts within this drawing are layered and open to interpretation. The physical confrontation in the foreground could represent a dispute over property (indicated by the chest), a political disagreement, or simply a personal quarrel played out in public. The presence of the onlookers suggests that this event is not private but rather a spectacle for those present. Their varied reactions further complicate the narrative, implying differing perspectives on the situation and potentially highlighting social dynamics within the community. The overall tone is one of controlled chaos – an incident disrupting the orderliness of urban life, observed with a mixture of concern and detached amusement.